<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spiritainment???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html</link>
	<description>Looking for the 1st century Church in 21st century America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:23:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Christianity vs. convenience &#171; My Deodorant is Giving Out</title>
		<link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html#comment-30904</link>
		<dc:creator>Christianity vs. convenience &#171; My Deodorant is Giving Out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html#comment-30904</guid>
		<description>[...] onthuhlist in American Culture, Modern Christianity.  trackback  A post at Cerulean Sanctum on &quot;Spiritainment brings up an interesting topic. A topic that puts me in Martin Luther mode. I&#039;m sorry this is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border-left: 0.5em solid #9BC4E2; padding: 1em;">
<p>[...] onthuhlist in American Culture, Modern Christianity.  trackback  A post at Cerulean Sanctum on &#8220;Spiritainment brings up an interesting topic. A topic that puts me in Martin Luther mode. I&#8217;m sorry this is [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onthuhlist</title>
		<link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html#comment-30614</link>
		<dc:creator>onthuhlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html#comment-30614</guid>
		<description>Dude,

You have gracefully put into words a collection of ideas and conclusions that God has been waking me up to recently. I say &quot;right on&quot;, and won&#039;t try to further the conversation by repeating what you&#039;ve already said. I&#039;m a songwriter, and though my SAT verbal score was abysmal (though the math and other analytical sections went splendidly), I still attempt to express truths in my stumbling way. My latest lyrics-in-progress mirror similar concerns - how many &#039;Christian&#039; songs (including worship songs) sing to a &#039;you&#039; who is never defined anywhere in the song. 
---------------------------------
What&#039;s the problem with Christian music?
We don&#039;t even mention the name of Christ anymore.
If you&#039;re singing &#039;bout Jesus, prove it.
The Muslims are singing your song to a God with no son.

We&#039;re singing &quot;Bless your name&quot;
But if it&#039;s just the same,
We&#039;d rather not say who we&#039;re singing to,
We&#039;re just a bit ashamed.

What&#039;s the matter with Christian music?
We don&#039;t even mention the name of Christ anymore.
The Christian &quot;Top 40 Countdown&quot; proves it.
A nameless &quot;you&quot; is all that we&#039;re singing for.

Radios playing your song.
The Krishnas sing along.
They&#039;re not affected, good or bad,
By your self-focused feelings-based ramblings. 
------------------------
The reason this is a pet peeve of mine is because we live in a multi-religious culture now, and one can no longer assume that the listener of a song knows you&#039;re singing about Jesus or the God of the Bible. Just visit Detroit - tour the Edsel Ford mansion, and you&#039;ll find a Krishna temple. A few miles away in Hamtramck, they&#039;re issuing the Muslim call to prayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude,</p>
<p>You have gracefully put into words a collection of ideas and conclusions that God has been waking me up to recently. I say &#8220;right on&#8221;, and won&#8217;t try to further the conversation by repeating what you&#8217;ve already said. I&#8217;m a songwriter, and though my SAT verbal score was abysmal (though the math and other analytical sections went splendidly), I still attempt to express truths in my stumbling way. My latest lyrics-in-progress mirror similar concerns &#8211; how many &#8216;Christian&#8217; songs (including worship songs) sing to a &#8216;you&#8217; who is never defined anywhere in the song.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
What&#8217;s the problem with Christian music?<br />
We don&#8217;t even mention the name of Christ anymore.<br />
If you&#8217;re singing &#8217;bout Jesus, prove it.<br />
The Muslims are singing your song to a God with no son.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re singing &#8220;Bless your name&#8221;<br />
But if it&#8217;s just the same,<br />
We&#8217;d rather not say who we&#8217;re singing to,<br />
We&#8217;re just a bit ashamed.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the matter with Christian music?<br />
We don&#8217;t even mention the name of Christ anymore.<br />
The Christian &#8220;Top 40 Countdown&#8221; proves it.<br />
A nameless &#8220;you&#8221; is all that we&#8217;re singing for.</p>
<p>Radios playing your song.<br />
The Krishnas sing along.<br />
They&#8217;re not affected, good or bad,<br />
By your self-focused feelings-based ramblings.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
The reason this is a pet peeve of mine is because we live in a multi-religious culture now, and one can no longer assume that the listener of a song knows you&#8217;re singing about Jesus or the God of the Bible. Just visit Detroit &#8211; tour the Edsel Ford mansion, and you&#8217;ll find a Krishna temple. A few miles away in Hamtramck, they&#8217;re issuing the Muslim call to prayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerulean Sanctum &#187; The Best of Cerulean Sanctum 2006</title>
		<link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html#comment-24388</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerulean Sanctum &#187; The Best of Cerulean Sanctum 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html#comment-24388</guid>
		<description>[...] Spiritainment??? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border-left: 0.5em solid #9BC4E2; padding: 1em;">
<p>[...] Spiritainment??? [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim A</title>
		<link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html#comment-5849</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/07/spiritainment.html#comment-5849</guid>
		<description>Very provocative, Dan.  Our obsession with media leads us to interact with everything  with a TV-screen flatness and a self-indulgent focus.  I just got a stiff lesson in what it means that Baby Boomers in general have treated their children like a media addiction, at Parent Orientation for my daughter&#039;s college.  Read about it at &lt;a href=&quot;http://mother-lode.blogspot.com/2006/09/we-are-not-amused.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mother-Lode&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very provocative, Dan.  Our obsession with media leads us to interact with everything  with a TV-screen flatness and a self-indulgent focus.  I just got a stiff lesson in what it means that Baby Boomers in general have treated their children like a media addiction, at Parent Orientation for my daughter&#8217;s college.  Read about it at <a href="http://mother-lode.blogspot.com/2006/09/we-are-not-amused.html" rel="nofollow">Mother-Lode</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
