jump to navigation

Repost: “21 Steps to a 21st Century Church” Series
September 15, 2006

Posted by Dan Edelen in : Repost

Functions : Trackback, Print This Post , Email This Post

This series kicked off 2006 and got a lot of people talking. Bettering the Church in America is why Cerulean Sanctum exists. What better segue into next weeks new posts than this:

21 Steps to a 21st Century Church - Part 1

21 Steps to a 21st Century Church - Part 2

21 Steps to a 21st Century Church - Part 3

21 Steps to a 21st Century Church - Part 4

21 Steps to a 21st Century Church - Part 5 (Conclusion)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags:


Related posts:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

Comment by Ekval
2006-09-15 06:58:28

Hey Dan, Just thought that I’d say it will be great to have you officially back next week.

At the same time, there was a lot of good stuff here in the past few weeks, some things that I’d read before but got a bit more of the second time around. There were also a lot of things that were new to me (from you) and they were also great.

I’d just like to say that having gone back through all of this I really love your blog more and more. You seem to avoid the back and forth wars that consume a lot of the blogosphere. And as you have mentioned in the blog, you take a different tack, not just quibbling about a point of theology typically but diving into the church. At the same time, Scriptures are foremost, but unlike some of your blogging companions, your theological perspective doesn’t obfuscate the issues.

Thanks…you have provided some needed encouragement and stimulation without making a person want to flame you!

 
Comment by jettybetty
2006-09-15 15:41:15

Good stuff–
Keep preaching it!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post