<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Silencing the Voice of Hearsay in the Church</title> <atom:link href="http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/12/silencing-the-voice-of-hearsay-in-the-church.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/12/silencing-the-voice-of-hearsay-in-the-church.html</link> <description>Looking for the 1st century Church in 21st century America</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Swinging from the Vine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Through the looking glass: Bob.blog</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/12/silencing-the-voice-of-hearsay-in-the-church.html#comment-23370</link> <dc:creator>Swinging from the Vine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Through the looking glass: Bob.blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/12/silencing-the-voice-of-hearsay-in-the-church.html#comment-23370</guid> <description>[...] And another Dan wonders&#8230; as MacArthur researched and wrote this book, did he: [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And another Dan wonders&#8230; as MacArthur researched and wrote this book, did he: [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Emergent Church Movement and Your Mom&#8217;s Church &#187; Strangers and Exiles</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/12/silencing-the-voice-of-hearsay-in-the-church.html#comment-22476</link> <dc:creator>The Emergent Church Movement and Your Mom&#8217;s Church &#187; Strangers and Exiles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/12/silencing-the-voice-of-hearsay-in-the-church.html#comment-22476</guid> <description>[...] Dan Edelen of Cerulean Sanctum on Silencing the Voice of Hearsay in the Church in relation to the ECM [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Edelen of Cerulean Sanctum on Silencing the Voice of Hearsay in the Church in relation to the ECM [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Edelen</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/12/silencing-the-voice-of-hearsay-in-the-church.html#comment-19304</link> <dc:creator>Dan Edelen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:57:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2006/12/silencing-the-voice-of-hearsay-in-the-church.html#comment-19304</guid> <description>Jamie,
A book about absolute truth requires that the author get to the source of truth.
No one is saying that the published material of the EC leaders isn&#039;t fair game. However, you and I know that interpretation matters. For that reason, I believe any burden of proof comes down to personal interaction.
Again, the Scriptures are clear. If we have a beef against a brother (and the author&#039;s book is a critical piece), we should confront him face-to-face. Only then will truth will out and our tendency to be overly critical tempered. A foe with whom I&#039;ve shared a meal is less my enemy than my friend.
I have no beef against the author. I am merely hoping that he has gone the extra &quot;Christian&quot; mile and pursued the kind of personal interaction a book like his needs. If he has, then great. He&#039;s pursued the right course and done his subject matter proud. If not, well....
Again, I am not criticizing the author. I am asking whether he has sat down with real people and talked with them about the matter that drives the core idea in his book. If he has, more power to him. I applaud that kind of pursuit of truth.
Shouldn&#039;t we Christians always deal with the pursuit of truth on the most granular level possible? If truth matters, then we should always get to the heart. That means personally interacting with people and with God. We most definitely trumpet the latter. Why then is the former so hard to pull off?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie,</p><p>A book about absolute truth requires that the author get to the source of truth.</p><p>No one is saying that the published material of the EC leaders isn&#8217;t fair game. However, you and I know that interpretation matters. For that reason, I believe any burden of proof comes down to personal interaction.</p><p>Again, the Scriptures are clear. If we have a beef against a brother (and the author&#8217;s book is a critical piece), we should confront him face-to-face. Only then will truth will out and our tendency to be overly critical tempered. A foe with whom I&#8217;ve shared a meal is less my enemy than my friend.</p><p>I have no beef against the author. I am merely hoping that he has gone the extra &#8220;Christian&#8221; mile and pursued the kind of personal interaction a book like his needs. If he has, then great. He&#8217;s pursued the right course and done his subject matter proud. If not, well&#8230;.</p><p>Again, I am not criticizing the author. I am asking whether he has sat down with real people and talked with them about the matter that drives the core idea in his book. If he has, more power to him. I applaud that kind of pursuit of truth.</p><p>Shouldn&#8217;t we Christians always deal with the pursuit of truth on the most granular level possible? If truth matters, then we should always get to the heart. That means personally interacting with people and with God. We most definitely trumpet the latter. Why then is the former so hard to pull off?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!--
Hyper cache file: b5e1cca3392a78fa6680907614da328f
Cache created: 13-02-2012 09:05:13
HCE Version: 0.9.8
Load AVG: 0.31(5)
-->
