<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Holy Who?</title> <atom:link href="http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/03/the-holy-who.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/03/the-holy-who.html</link> <description>Looking for the 1st century Church in 21st century America</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Great, Free Download from Christianaudio.com for June &#124; Cerulean Sanctum</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/03/the-holy-who.html#comment-47176</link> <dc:creator>Great, Free Download from Christianaudio.com for June &#124; Cerulean Sanctum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:16:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/03/the-holy-who.html#comment-47176</guid> <description>[...] the Holy Spirit, please see one of the most commented upon posts here at Cerulean Sanctum, The Holy Who?.Related postsYour Holy Spirit Is W-A-Y Too Safe (11)Why You Can&#8217;t Explain the Gifts of the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Holy Spirit, please see one of the most commented upon posts here at Cerulean Sanctum, The Holy Who?.Related postsYour Holy Spirit Is W-A-Y Too Safe (11)Why You Can&#8217;t Explain the Gifts of the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Edelen</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/03/the-holy-who.html#comment-44749</link> <dc:creator>Dan Edelen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 21:30:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/03/the-holy-who.html#comment-44749</guid> <description>Patrick,
I still read new comments on old posts, so coming late to the game is okay.
The whole world is going Pentecostal, mostly because the Pentecostals are the most dedicated to missions and evangelism.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p><p>I still read new comments on old posts, so coming late to the game is okay.</p><p>The whole world is going Pentecostal, mostly because the Pentecostals are the most dedicated to missions and evangelism.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick O</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/03/the-holy-who.html#comment-44746</link> <dc:creator>Patrick O</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:22:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/03/the-holy-who.html#comment-44746</guid> <description>Dan, obviously at this post really, really late.  Doing some basic research trying to see what&#039;s going on in emerging church theology, and especially on the Holy Spirit.  There&#039;s still a pretty big lack of study on the Holy Spirit in emerging/missional circles, somewhat intentionally in fact.  A lot of emerging church thought is reactionary, pushing back against what is seen as excess in various churches.  A lot of emerging/missional people have come out of Pentecostal/charismatic churches and so have lingering frustrations they want to avoid.
Add to this too the fact that the contemporary church really itself doesn&#039;t have a holistic pneumatology, and has essentially ceded the topic of the Spirit to the Pentecostal/charismatic world.
This isn&#039;t true in academic thought, but broadly throughout the church if the Holy Spirit is mentioned or sought, there is an immediate reaction related to opinions on Pentecostalism.
The topic has also been, from this, basically limited to &#039;spiritual gifts&#039; or other churchy add-ons rather than a substantive theological topic in its own right.
I did write an emerging pneumatology of sorts titled &lt;i&gt;It&#039;s a Dance: Moving with the Holy Spirit&lt;/i&gt; that takes the basic traits of the emerging churches and shows how these are broader, and Scriptural, expressions precisely of the Holy Spirit.  An emphasis on Jesus, community, giving, welcoming strangers, participation, non-hierarchical leadership, transformative worship, and creativity are the works of the Spirit in the Bible, going beyond the more exciting emphases focused on in a lot of charismatic communities.  To this I also added the emphasis on holiness.
I&#039;m pushing for a more substantive study in this direction, presenting on this same topic in an academic style last year at the Society of Pentecostal Studies conference.
There&#039;s definitely a burgeoning interest from the Pentecostal side, as they see a need to broaden their understanding of the Spirit in a holistic way. But there&#039;s not too much interest yet from the emerging side.
But, I think this is something that emerging church folks are really going to be addressing more and more, especially as the movement matures and begins to produce more overall theological reflection.
Before posting this note I read about the accident in your family.  I pray there is substantive healing--physical and emotional--and substantive answers to the needs this provokes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, obviously at this post really, really late.  Doing some basic research trying to see what&#8217;s going on in emerging church theology, and especially on the Holy Spirit.  There&#8217;s still a pretty big lack of study on the Holy Spirit in emerging/missional circles, somewhat intentionally in fact.  A lot of emerging church thought is reactionary, pushing back against what is seen as excess in various churches.  A lot of emerging/missional people have come out of Pentecostal/charismatic churches and so have lingering frustrations they want to avoid.</p><p>Add to this too the fact that the contemporary church really itself doesn&#8217;t have a holistic pneumatology, and has essentially ceded the topic of the Spirit to the Pentecostal/charismatic world.</p><p>This isn&#8217;t true in academic thought, but broadly throughout the church if the Holy Spirit is mentioned or sought, there is an immediate reaction related to opinions on Pentecostalism.</p><p>The topic has also been, from this, basically limited to &#8216;spiritual gifts&#8217; or other churchy add-ons rather than a substantive theological topic in its own right.</p><p>I did write an emerging pneumatology of sorts titled <i>It&#8217;s a Dance: Moving with the Holy Spirit</i> that takes the basic traits of the emerging churches and shows how these are broader, and Scriptural, expressions precisely of the Holy Spirit.  An emphasis on Jesus, community, giving, welcoming strangers, participation, non-hierarchical leadership, transformative worship, and creativity are the works of the Spirit in the Bible, going beyond the more exciting emphases focused on in a lot of charismatic communities.  To this I also added the emphasis on holiness.</p><p>I&#8217;m pushing for a more substantive study in this direction, presenting on this same topic in an academic style last year at the Society of Pentecostal Studies conference.</p><p>There&#8217;s definitely a burgeoning interest from the Pentecostal side, as they see a need to broaden their understanding of the Spirit in a holistic way. But there&#8217;s not too much interest yet from the emerging side.</p><p>But, I think this is something that emerging church folks are really going to be addressing more and more, especially as the movement matures and begins to produce more overall theological reflection.</p><p>Before posting this note I read about the accident in your family.  I pray there is substantive healing&#8211;physical and emotional&#8211;and substantive answers to the needs this provokes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
