<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Book Thoughts</title> <atom:link href="http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/07/book-thoughts.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/07/book-thoughts.html</link> <description>Looking for the 1st century Church in 21st century America</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: David Riggins</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/07/book-thoughts.html#comment-28192</link> <dc:creator>David Riggins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/07/book-thoughts.html#comment-28192</guid> <description>I think one of the major problems the author of today faces is the tendancy to write for the screen, rather than the mind.  The imagination used to see the frustration of &quot;The hero leaned back on his heels as he surveyed the burning shambles of his home, and swore, slowly and with great imagination&quot; is twisted by the shortcut of the movie theater, where we have to know what those words were because we don&#039;t have the imagination to feel the hero&#039;s frustration without seeing his lips move and know just what it was he said.  So an author fills in the blanks with frank dialog: &quot;The hero viewed his burning home. &#039;$%#&amp;@&#039; He said.&quot;
Consider scenes of societal disintigration written by Dickens versus Vonnagut, and ponder whether the level of social decay has changed, or the level of what is acceptable to read has changed.  Consider the &quot;R&quot; rating for &quot;Ordinary People&quot; and ponder whether that same rating would be given today.  One can often watch movies from the 30&#039;s and know which were &quot;pre-code&quot; simply by what is blatant versus allusion.  If we are to measure descriptive power by what &lt;em&gt;words&lt;/em&gt; we can and cannot write in order to be accepted, then we have already begun to lose the creative battle.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the major problems the author of today faces is the tendancy to write for the screen, rather than the mind.  The imagination used to see the frustration of &#8220;The hero leaned back on his heels as he surveyed the burning shambles of his home, and swore, slowly and with great imagination&#8221; is twisted by the shortcut of the movie theater, where we have to know what those words were because we don&#8217;t have the imagination to feel the hero&#8217;s frustration without seeing his lips move and know just what it was he said.  So an author fills in the blanks with frank dialog: &#8220;The hero viewed his burning home. &#8216;$%#&amp;@&#8217; He said.&#8221;</p><p>Consider scenes of societal disintigration written by Dickens versus Vonnagut, and ponder whether the level of social decay has changed, or the level of what is acceptable to read has changed.  Consider the &#8220;R&#8221; rating for &#8220;Ordinary People&#8221; and ponder whether that same rating would be given today.  One can often watch movies from the 30&#8242;s and know which were &#8220;pre-code&#8221; simply by what is blatant versus allusion.  If we are to measure descriptive power by what <em>words</em> we can and cannot write in order to be accepted, then we have already begun to lose the creative battle.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith Brenton</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/07/book-thoughts.html#comment-28190</link> <dc:creator>Keith Brenton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:47:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/07/book-thoughts.html#comment-28190</guid> <description>It ain&#039;t fiction - it&#039;s autobiographical, by a former female Episcopal priest - but maybe that&#039;s why I liked Barbara Taylor&#039;s &quot;Leaving Church&quot; so much. It doesn&#039;t get any more real than that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It ain&#8217;t fiction &#8211; it&#8217;s autobiographical, by a former female Episcopal priest &#8211; but maybe that&#8217;s why I liked Barbara Taylor&#8217;s &#8220;Leaving Church&#8221; so much. It doesn&#8217;t get any more real than that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Edelen</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/07/book-thoughts.html#comment-28188</link> <dc:creator>Dan Edelen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:42:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/2007/07/book-thoughts.html#comment-28188</guid> <description>Milton,
Allender does say to be judicious, but he doesn&#039;t give guidelines. Nor does he give any insights into what to do if some can&#039;t handle the honesty no matter how judicious one is. To me, that makes it nearly impossible to apply his book. When I thought about how I would even classify his book, I thought it might be more of a &quot;meditation&quot; on leadership than advice or self-help. That really muddies the water of how best to apply it in real life situations.
But as I&#039;ve found in Christian education, everyone&#039;s got a theory. Now show me the practice!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milton,</p><p>Allender does say to be judicious, but he doesn&#8217;t give guidelines. Nor does he give any insights into what to do if some can&#8217;t handle the honesty no matter how judicious one is. To me, that makes it nearly impossible to apply his book. When I thought about how I would even classify his book, I thought it might be more of a &#8220;meditation&#8221; on leadership than advice or self-help. That really muddies the water of how best to apply it in real life situations.</p><p>But as I&#8217;ve found in Christian education, everyone&#8217;s got a theory. Now show me the practice!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
