<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: More on Charismatic Gifts</title> <atom:link href="http://ceruleansanctum.com/2008/05/more-on-charismatic-gifts.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2008/05/more-on-charismatic-gifts.html</link> <description>Looking for the 1st century Church in 21st century America</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2008/05/more-on-charismatic-gifts.html#comment-43694</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=871#comment-43694</guid> <description>Sorry to be in this thread so late, but I thought it was interesting and had some thoughts that haven&#039;t been shared yet.
I believe John Wimber was more aligned with slw&#039;s contention that any gift could be used situationally by any believer as the Holy Spirit distributes it (with the exception of the office gifts, of course).  The interpretive key he focused on was how Paul repeatedly mentions throughout the letter &quot;when you come together,&quot; meaning any specific gathering of the church.  (See 1 Cor 11:18,20,33 and 14:26).  So the &quot;no&quot; answer sought after above meant &quot;any given time you come together, will all people exhibit all gifts?&quot;  The answer for this is obviously no.  This seems to read particularly well when you consider the public use of tongues vs. the private prayer language that Paul wishes &quot;everyone would use&quot; and that he claimed he used more than all of them (1Cor 14:5, 18).  Paul also seems to encourage them that they can &quot;all&quot; prophesy in other texts.  To me this interpetation harmonizes what can seem like contradictory positions from Paul about tongues and prophecy.
This is a view I personally hold, and helps me to answer j a n&#039;s thoughts about &quot;if tongues are so great, why would God withold them from anyone?&quot;  Just as with the ability to prophesy, I believe he won&#039;t.
But...it can be quite a journey getting there, can&#039;t it?  I think the variety of experiences shared in these two posts attest to that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to be in this thread so late, but I thought it was interesting and had some thoughts that haven&#8217;t been shared yet.</p><p>I believe John Wimber was more aligned with slw&#8217;s contention that any gift could be used situationally by any believer as the Holy Spirit distributes it (with the exception of the office gifts, of course).  The interpretive key he focused on was how Paul repeatedly mentions throughout the letter &#8220;when you come together,&#8221; meaning any specific gathering of the church.  (See 1 Cor 11:18,20,33 and 14:26).  So the &#8220;no&#8221; answer sought after above meant &#8220;any given time you come together, will all people exhibit all gifts?&#8221;  The answer for this is obviously no.  This seems to read particularly well when you consider the public use of tongues vs. the private prayer language that Paul wishes &#8220;everyone would use&#8221; and that he claimed he used more than all of them (1Cor 14:5, 18).  Paul also seems to encourage them that they can &#8220;all&#8221; prophesy in other texts.  To me this interpetation harmonizes what can seem like contradictory positions from Paul about tongues and prophecy.</p><p>This is a view I personally hold, and helps me to answer j a n&#8217;s thoughts about &#8220;if tongues are so great, why would God withold them from anyone?&#8221;  Just as with the ability to prophesy, I believe he won&#8217;t.</p><p>But&#8230;it can be quite a journey getting there, can&#8217;t it?  I think the variety of experiences shared in these two posts attest to that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cerulean Sanctum&#8217;s Best Posts of 2008 &#124; Cerulean Sanctum</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2008/05/more-on-charismatic-gifts.html#comment-43673</link> <dc:creator>Cerulean Sanctum&#8217;s Best Posts of 2008 &#124; Cerulean Sanctum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:22:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=871#comment-43673</guid> <description>[...] More on Charismatic Gifts [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More on Charismatic Gifts [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DanM</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2008/05/more-on-charismatic-gifts.html#comment-41895</link> <dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=871#comment-41895</guid> <description>&lt;cite&gt;The only gift we are clearly mandated to test is prophecy.&lt;/cite&gt;
What about toungues?  1 Cor. 14:28 sounds like a test to me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><cite>The only gift we are clearly mandated to test is prophecy.</cite><br
/> What about toungues?  1 Cor. 14:28 sounds like a test to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!--
Hyper cache file: 0963e46706d3781f315b7a6770861da5
Cache created: 13-02-2012 04:39:01
HCE Version: 0.9.8
Load AVG: 0.35(5)
-->
