<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Cerulean Sanctum&#8217;s Best Posts of 2008</title> <atom:link href="http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/02/cerulean-sanctums-best-posts-of-2008.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/02/cerulean-sanctums-best-posts-of-2008.html</link> <description>Looking for the 1st century Church in 21st century America</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: SJLC</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/02/cerulean-sanctums-best-posts-of-2008.html#comment-43691</link> <dc:creator>SJLC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:59:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=1150#comment-43691</guid> <description>I&#039;m going to forward urls for your 2-part on soul vs. spirit to my pastor. He led a discussion in Bible study on why he believes people are tripartate even though most current theologians seem to believe bipartate. Your posts really bring out why it is important,  not a minor detail of interest only to theologians.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to forward urls for your 2-part on soul vs. spirit to my pastor. He led a discussion in Bible study on why he believes people are tripartate even though most current theologians seem to believe bipartate. Your posts really bring out why it is important,  not a minor detail of interest only to theologians.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Edelen</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/02/cerulean-sanctums-best-posts-of-2008.html#comment-43690</link> <dc:creator>Dan Edelen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:08:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=1150#comment-43690</guid> <description>Thanks, Boethius. I appreciate the kind words.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Boethius. I appreciate the kind words.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: boethius</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/02/cerulean-sanctums-best-posts-of-2008.html#comment-43689</link> <dc:creator>boethius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:08:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=1150#comment-43689</guid> <description>I first came to your site searching for contrary opinions to the Lakeland Revival.  As someone who had seen Todd Bentley in person recently and wanted a fresh perspective on the man and the mania behind him, I appreciated the sensible, Holy Spirit-driven appraisal of what seemed to me a marginally insane overreaching by &quot;the Church&quot; for revival.  As someone who became a Christian in a Pentocostal / Charismatic environment, its tendencies to fawn over signs and wonders and in particular sketchy Charismatic &quot;personalities&quot; have often put me ill at ease.  I found in your blog a kindred spirit who does some amazing writing about topics that matter to an average, occasionally intellectual Charismatic who sees his own lacking qualities in a church that desperately needs major transformation rather than fleeting band-aids.  In short - all of your writing is fabulous and it&#039;s hard for me to pick one post I prefer as the best but your writing about the &quot;Charismatic Crack-up&quot; probably ranks up there.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first came to your site searching for contrary opinions to the Lakeland Revival.  As someone who had seen Todd Bentley in person recently and wanted a fresh perspective on the man and the mania behind him, I appreciated the sensible, Holy Spirit-driven appraisal of what seemed to me a marginally insane overreaching by &#8220;the Church&#8221; for revival.  As someone who became a Christian in a Pentocostal / Charismatic environment, its tendencies to fawn over signs and wonders and in particular sketchy Charismatic &#8220;personalities&#8221; have often put me ill at ease.  I found in your blog a kindred spirit who does some amazing writing about topics that matter to an average, occasionally intellectual Charismatic who sees his own lacking qualities in a church that desperately needs major transformation rather than fleeting band-aids.  In short &#8211; all of your writing is fabulous and it&#8217;s hard for me to pick one post I prefer as the best but your writing about the &#8220;Charismatic Crack-up&#8221; probably ranks up there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
