<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Equipping the Saints: That Catchy Tune</title> <atom:link href="http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/08/equipping-the-saints-that-catchy-tune.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/08/equipping-the-saints-that-catchy-tune.html</link> <description>Looking for the 1st century Church in 21st century America</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Eddie Manes</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/08/equipping-the-saints-that-catchy-tune.html#comment-46117</link> <dc:creator>Eddie Manes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:52:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=1272#comment-46117</guid> <description>I always wondered how many people out there were sick of 1, 5, 6, 4. I actually googled 1, 5, 6, 4 chord progression and it brought me here, because I thought there had to be a discussion about this somewhere.When I run across a song that uses this chord progression, I actually hesitate to use it as a result, because I have a hard time getting past it&#039;s common usage. I actually think there&#039;s some method to it&#039;s effectiveness. I try to listen to Christian radio now and again to hear what&#039;s going on, but anytime I hear another song with this progression, I just sigh and change the channel.I can name about 5 David Crowder songs that use it. And they&#039;re many of his most popular.I know a lot of people are introduced to Christ through it, but it sure seems like many songwriters in the church are sacrificing their best and most creative work for something easy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered how many people out there were sick of 1, 5, 6, 4. I actually googled 1, 5, 6, 4 chord progression and it brought me here, because I thought there had to be a discussion about this somewhere.</p><p>When I run across a song that uses this chord progression, I actually hesitate to use it as a result, because I have a hard time getting past it&#8217;s common usage. I actually think there&#8217;s some method to it&#8217;s effectiveness. I try to listen to Christian radio now and again to hear what&#8217;s going on, but anytime I hear another song with this progression, I just sigh and change the channel.</p><p>I can name about 5 David Crowder songs that use it. And they&#8217;re many of his most popular.</p><p>I know a lot of people are introduced to Christ through it, but it sure seems like many songwriters in the church are sacrificing their best and most creative work for something easy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Edelen</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/08/equipping-the-saints-that-catchy-tune.html#comment-45599</link> <dc:creator>Dan Edelen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:34:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=1272#comment-45599</guid> <description>Thanks, Jeri!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jeri!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Edelen</title><link>http://ceruleansanctum.com/2009/08/equipping-the-saints-that-catchy-tune.html#comment-45598</link> <dc:creator>Dan Edelen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:31:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ceruleansanctum.com/?p=1272#comment-45598</guid> <description>April,In it&#039;s day, some churchmen complained that &quot;Softly &amp; Tenderly&quot; was the equivalent of what people say today is a &quot;God is my boyfriend&quot; song. It&#039;s funny how what was once scorned is today embraced. I wonder what &quot;classics&quot; my grandchildren will be singing...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April,</p><p>In it&#8217;s day, some churchmen complained that &#8220;Softly &#038; Tenderly&#8221; was the equivalent of what people say today is a &#8220;God is my boyfriend&#8221; song. It&#8217;s funny how what was once scorned is today embraced. I wonder what &#8220;classics&#8221; my grandchildren will be singing&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk

Served from: ceruleansanctum.com @ 2010-07-31 03:42:24 -->