Love Sin / Hate Sin

Standard

My church held their annual picnic this last weekend. One of the church-wide contests was a chili cook-off. I told my wife I was going to enter and win the whole thing. This blogger can cook a scrumptious bowl of chili. I whipped up a batch, entered it, and indeed won the whole thing.

Upon winning that coveted blue ribbon, I let out a huge whoop, raised the hands high, and let everyone there know that I was triumphant. And later I felt bad about doing so.

Was it too much? The more time passed, the more I felt that I’d been a tad over the top in my moment of chili glory. While the other contestants trash talked before the judging, I was relatively quiet—I let the chili do the talking. But afterwards I really wanted to rub their noses in it, at least a little.

It’s been a tough last few weeks. The tenor in the household is “muddle through” stage. That stage has been common around here far more than it should, and I’ve grown to hate it. You feel that things will never get better.

So is a little rejoicing for a silly contest too much? Can a little hollering be good for the soul here? Or am I just exulting at someone else’s expense?

Sin is perpetually crouching at the door. The smell of it lingers in the air. And though we are told to flee it, despise it, and rail against it, there are times that I must confess—to my own dishonor—that I love it.

During my tenure in the Lutheran Church, I never got a handle on Martin Luther’s famous aphorism on sin that he penned to his buddy Philip Melanchthon 484 years ago:

If you are a preacher of grace, then preach a true and not a fictitious grace; if grace is true, you must bear a true and not a fictitious sin. God does not save people who are only fictitious sinners. Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly, for he is victorious over sin, death, and the world. As long as we are here [in this world] we have to sin. This life is not the dwelling place of righteousness, but, as Peter says, we look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. It is enough that by the riches of God’s glory we have come to know the Lamb that takes away the sin of the world. No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day. Do you think that the purchase price that was paid for the redemption of our sins by so great a Lamb is too small? Pray boldly—you too are a mighty sinner.

Now that I am older, though, it makes more sense to me. As much as I am commended to loathe sin, there are still parts of me that love it just a little more than I should.

  • I love/hate reveling in accolades bestowed upon me.
  • I love/hate watching foes—real or imagined—get their comeuppance.
  • I love/hate convincing myself that I’m smarter than most people.
  • I love/hate gazing just a breath too long at the pretty young thing in line ahead of me at the grocery store.
  • I love/hate cutting down an opponent with a witticism worthy of Oscar Wilde or Will Rogers.
  • I love/hate knowing that the terrorist who just blew himself up and took out a dozen other people is going to burn in hell for eternity.
  • I love/hate watching haughty people taken down a peg or two.
  • I love/hate the dark fantasies I entertain.
  • I love/hate my own pride.

As a younger Christian, I would deceive myself into thinking that I wasn’t like this. But faux innocence is just that—a denial of the reality that in this world there will be sin. No one is immune no matter how perfect the persona we project to others.

I think the Christian blogosphere perpetuates this. Cruise around enough blogs on a daily basis and it’s fairly easy to see the hate portion of the love sin / hate sin equation. Yet there’s not quite as much of the love sin portion displayed. MasksToo much confession may alienate the more righteous readers. Too much confession may cast doubt on how well ANY of us Christians are doing in walking the walk as well as we talk the talk.

Far more of us are dying for confession than almost anything else, I suspect. Whitewashing takes exorbitant amounts of work, and legions of Christians are propping up an image of a fictitious sinner, the error Luther warns of, to their own detriment.

I crave grace, don’t you? What a marvelous gift, sublime, healing, and transforming all in one. Because of my love for grace, I can never be a fictitious sinner. My errors will always be bold. I can only ask that my prayer of repentance be yet bolder still.

Are you laboring to maintain the façade of a rosy righteous glow when darkness has become your friend instead? Christian, stop fighting and let someone else know!

…for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God….
—Romans 3:23 ESV

There is peace in confessing your sins not only to God, but to someone else:

Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working.
—James 5:16 ESV

Don’t be a fictitious sinner. It will steal your joy away. If you love a particular sin, acknowledge that before someone else and allow someone to draw up alongside you in the name of the Lord:

…a three-fold cord is not quickly broken.
—Ecclesiastes 4:12

Most of all, rest in the peace that the Lord Jesus bought with his own blood, the very blood that takes away the sins of the world. He said:

Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid.
—John 14:27 ESV

Beloved, now is the day to come into the light of Christ’s grace.

Innocence Lost

Standard

Not so innocent-looking childWe went as a family to the movies yesterday. That’s an exceedingly rare occurrence. Some friends gave us $40 worth of cinema gift certificates a few years ago and before today we’d only used $13 of them. Most films just don’t appeal to us anymore because film producers seem hellbent on tossing in enough crudities to spoil whatever mood they are seeking to create. While we do take out a couple DVDs from the library now and then, we return to the same limited number for our son’s viewing. A starkly limited number.

Far too many TV shows and movies aimed at children today possess a compulsion to toss in adult references that sail over kid’s heads. The cusp of this trend saw producers adding cultural allusions alone: highlighting great literature, mocking vapid pop culture icons, or delving into history. No objections from me. But when that wasn’t enough, we started seeing some titillation factor added in, with references to sex, profanity, and less noble ideas.

Sunday afternoon we saw Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-rabbit. Our son is an enormous fan of their previous three adventures—one of the very few DVDs we actually own—and we have found this series to be a rarity in its combination of humor and innocence. The hapless cheese-loving inventor and his long-suffering pooch are about as safe as safe can be for both kids and adults.

But after yesterday, I’m not sure if I hold that same opinion.

That’s a sad admission from me. I was disappointed in the number of adult gags in this new film. The biggest laugh that came from the adults in the audience happened toward the end when Wallace was forced to hide his nakedness with an unfortunately labeled box. Funny? Yes, but not in the way you want to see from these characters. To me, there were too many little “wink-wink-nudge-nudge-know-what-I-mean” kinds of gags in the movie. Worse yet, it perpetuated the Hollywood stereotype (despite being a British production) that all clergy are unsympathetic characters who more often than not ally with the villains rather than the heroes. All this fogged the memory of just how whimsical and perfectly safe the Wallace & Gromit series has been in the past. I left the theater feeling hollow—not an emotion I expected.

The feature film was preceded by a short spotlighting the four maniacal penguins from the film Madagascar. We did not see Madagascar because of the PG rating and the obvious double entendres I noted in the trailer, a perfect example of where things are going in films today that are aimed at kids. While I found the short to be clever and funny, the lead penguin’s choice of swear phrases was always thinly veiled: “Shitake mushrooms!” or “Grand Coulee Dam.” Do we need that? Or did we need some of the previews we were forced to watch? My son was terrified by the Giger-like aliens hunting the two boys in the preview for the latest Chris Van Allsburg screen translation, Zathura.

As a parent, I hate the full-frontal assault on innocence I see all around. Yesterday, I read an article from a Las Vegas-based reporter for The Wall Street Journal who wrote that the family-friendly experiment conducted by Vegas during the late ’90s and early ’00s has been scrapped in favor of more lasciviousness. Not that we should expect Vegas to be the moral center of the universe, but still. Someone somewhere caved. The article said that even the pirate battle at the Treasure Island Casino has gone from family viewing to nothing more than a sex romp. Well, at least there’s still the Bellagio dancing fountain show—until they decide one day to add topless mermaids. As goes Vegas, so goes everywhere else as the greedy seek to export what “works” in the town of “What happens here, stays here” to every entertainment venue in the country. Heaven help us should Vegas get translated to Orlando some future day so that “adults” can enjoy “Disney After Dark,” complete with brass poles and rhinestone G-strings.

And I don’t just hate all this for my child, ever more exposed to a “Girls (& Boys) Gone Wild” culture, but I hate it for myself. I used to not look at the bright posters filled with predominantly naked women plastered life-size in the storefront of every Victoria’s Secret. When my wife and I were dating, she noticed this and blessed me for it. Now, that’s changed for me and I don’t know why. I hate to think that I’m becoming inured to it all, that my life is becoming coarser rather than finer. But when the bottom has dropped out of the culture and the stench of the abattoir permeates everything, matters of degree get lost in the decay. Lot was vexed, and so are we all.

I’ve read too many articles lately on how teenage girls are now driving the downward moral spiral. At one time, society’s moral health was gauged by how the young women within a culture conformed to the best of that culture. With studies showing that girls are currently at the forefront of sexual experimentation rather than boys, we’ve not only got to wonder what is up with their parents, but we must now face the question of “How low is low?” At the movie there was a birthday party of girls I guessed were eight years old. When they broke into a chorus of “These Boots Are Made for Walkin’,” I just had to wonder whatever happened to “Michael, Row the Boat Ashore” or “How Much Is That Doggie in the Window”? Perplexed by these second graders singing a Nancy Sinatra song circa 1965 or so, I was later informed that Jessica Simpson sings that song today. (Isn’t Simpson a pastor’s daughter?) And no, I haven’t seen the banned video she made of that song, but it scares me to think that impressionable eight-year old girls have. I wonder whom they’ll “walk all over”—or who will walk over them—when they’re fourteen or fifteen. Or is the age of first sexual contact down to eleven now? I don’t desire to know that David Elkind’s fine book, The Hurried Child, no longer applies, not because we’ve improved how we protect our kids from the world, but because the example ages he cites in the book are half what they were when his warning debuted in 1981.

Lord God, I pray that all us parents can do by Your grace what we need to do to instill in our children some sense of propriety in a world gone wild. We need your help more desperately than ever. Amen.

Update: I had nothing to do with this!

What Hath Marla Wrought?

Standard

Marla's Flickr PicOkay, so Marla Swoffer over at Always Thirsty posts her Retro vs. Metro analysis of the factions that comprise the Christian blogosphere. Controversial? Well, she may have topped even my myths of homeschooling and blogging might be a waste of time posts. Then she reopens a past swipe I took at some of the Retro folks, trying to drain further blood out of the blogging leviathan that is Tim Challies.

I think she's nuts in attempting this comparison, but I'm listed as a co-conspirator; to save my blogging life I must comment below. My preferences are backgrounded in cerulean blue. Where there is no highlighting at all on either side, there is no preference or I simply want to stay out of a minefield. If both sides are highlighted, then I think a dichotomy is impossible.

RETROMETRO
Rural or Small TownUrban or Suburban
ChalliesiMonk
ESTJINFP
Left-BrainedRight-Brained
ConservativeLiberal
CalvinistArminian
Quiver FullFamily Planning
ProsePoetry
C.S. Lewis: Mere ChristianityC.S. Lewis: Chronicles of Narnia
HomeschoolPublic School
PyromaniacTall Skinny Kiwi
ThinkFeel
Sola ScripturaGod Revealed in Many Ways
ApologeticsTestimony
PuritansMystics
God the FatherJesus
IsolateIntegrate
PastFuture
Gifts of the Spirit: NOGifts of the Spirit: YES
WordsPictures
Criminal JusticeSocial Justice
ProverbsPsalms
Amy's Humble Musings(vacancy)
Historic ReformationNew Reformation
OlderYounger
PatrioticGlobal
Women: TraditionalWomen: Egalitarian
RantBrood
DoDream
ReformedEmergent
Theologically CorrectRelationally Relevant
Psychology: NOPsychology: YES
The ThinklingsThe Boar's Head Tavern
ESVThe Message
CertainOpen
Catholics: NOCatholics: YES
SermonConversation
TruthLove
HymnsModern Music
CraftsmanshipTechnology
LiteralMetaphorical
Harry Potter – NOHarry Potter – YES
PCMac

I don't want to get dragged into the battles on birth control, don't ascribe entirely to either the Calvinist or Arminian points of view, and have been over the schooling issues recently. My pick out of the Trinity? C'mon! Plus Marla forgot the Holy Spirit in that mix, so that makes the whole enterprise suspect. Justice has to cut all ways, but I'm burned out on justice issues, so I'm not commenting. Both the Reformed side and Emergent side have some blinders on, and the whole idea of pitting theology versus relationship is a moot one

Concerning my non-committal ways on a few blogs, both Tim Challies and Michael Spencer have linked to Cerulean Sanctum a couple times in the last ten days, so I don't bite the hands that expose this blog to more readers. Between the two, I probably come down somewhere in the middle. Phil versus Andrew? I've never gotten much from the Kiwi, and I read the Pyro more for the good writing and snark appeal than the apologetics, so those two are a wash for me.

There were a lot of false distinctions; on many of those I highlighted both sides. I think the distinction between Sola Scriptura versus God Revealed in Many Ways is a truly poor one, since I believe that they aren't in opposition. That may leave some readers scratching their heads, but I have no problem with my position even when those on both sides would contend it's impossible to believe both are equally true.

Anyway, that's where I stand. I can do no more.

Now what blog empire wants to strike back?