“Eat His Body, Drink His Blood”

Standard

Christians today think that the worship song “revolution” that we are experiencing is something new. But for those of us who have been firmly planted on the Earth while it has gone ’round the sun forty times or more, this trend is nothing new.

Catholics like Ray Repp brought a new folk mentality to worship music around the time of Vatican II. This trickled over into Protestant churches a few years later, especially within liturgical denominations. Songs like “I Am the Resurrection,” “Lord of the Dance,” “Pass It On,” and “They’ll Know We are Christians By Our Love” all were big hits when I was growing up in the Sixties. We sang them regularly as kids and even saw a few of them creep into the adult services in the Lutheran churches I was a part of at the time.

Despite the fact that I routinely sang Larry Norman’s “I Wish We’d All Been Ready,” the one song that always seemed the strangest to me was “Sons of God”:

Sons of God, hear his holy Word,
Gather ’round the table of the Lord,
Eat His body, drink His blood,
And we’ll sing a song of love,
Hallelu, hallelu, hallelu, hallelujah!

As a young person, I found this song (very Catholic, but heartily sung in our Lutheran church at the time) always hinted at a mystery far beyond what I understood whenever the communion meal was served. But now that I am older, I find the whole thing very eerie.

As I mentioned, I grew up Lutheran. And despite the fact that no one in the Lutheran Church today will agree on this, I was taught a consubstantiation position on communion. This differs from the Catholic transubstantiation in that the bread and wine were not “magically” transformed into the body and blood of Christ before the communicant partook of the elements, but rather “something mystical” happened to those elements after they were consumed. At least that is how I understood all this in my younger days.

Later, I wound up in the Presbyterian Church. I found that their take on communion—simply a remembrance done out of the command of Christ—to be highly lacking in any sense of the transcendent, unlike my Lutheran experience. This is not to say that I grasped what I’d been taught, but the evasiveness of responses to my pressing questions to older Lutherans was bothersome. I never did get a complete handle on the Lutheran view, and if any five Lutherans of varying ages were pulled off the street in your town today, they’d all have a different take on communion, I’m certain.

Now I am not of the cannibalistic sort, but despite the fact that I’d probably get a knot in my stomach singing “Sons of God” today, something has been lost in evangelical and charismatic ranks when it comes to communion. I’d love to see us come to some higher treatment of the communion meal. It deserves more than we are giving it.

I am firmly convinced that in many ways we have simplified too greatly the entire idea of communion. A complete meal hosted in the home is more what I hope to see, and some house churches have gone this way, but I also hold out hope that an invocation and celebration of the wine and bread would entail more than the casualness we bring to it. We have lost too much mystery in our meetings, and where better to restore it than in communion?

What is your take on communion? What are your reminiscences and joys over the communion meal? What would you like to see done differently? And lastly, do you feel that we have lost something in the transcendence of the meal itself?

Blessings!

12 thoughts on ““Eat His Body, Drink His Blood”

  1. I was also raised Lutheran (Missouri Synod), but am non-denominational now. Although I have several Lutheran friends.

    I don’t feel that whether it is literally Christ’s body and blood is the point of communion. Whether it is literal or symbolic makes no difference to me. It is still Christ regardless of literal or symbolic. I wish people would give up this old OLD debate.

    I do believe however that communion is our opportunity to come in contact with Christ in faith just as the woman who touched the hem of His garment. I have heard of people being healed when they have taken communion (“this is My body…broken for you”). But even then the point of communion is not just to be healed is it (“this is My blood…shed for you”)? We should not take communion lightly but we are to examine ourselves, right? We are to seek the forgivness of sins and “go and sin no more” right? I mean you are conciously in the presence of Jesus are you not?

    I am convinced that if we were physically and spiritually and conciously in Jesus’ presence, this question would seem silly and embarrassing to ask of Him. But if you want to ask Him when you see Him…promise me you’ll tell me what He said (LOL).

  2. Richard Reese

    from rreese622@hotmail.com if you want to be free of religion, place the bread and the wine in front of you and ask Jesus to Consecrate it for you to have communion with Him. For you have been made a priest and king and Jesus said I will not pray to the father for you, but you pray to the Father yourself, for the Father loves you because youlove me

  3. Davwe

    Sons of God – what a great song. Reminds me of being in 4th grade. So does There is a New Wind Blowin’, and They’ll know we are Christians.
    I never thought so deeply about the Eucherist as a transformation of body and blood; but more as a partaking of ownership of a way of life in Jesus. Sort of in the same way that you partake in a higher learning once you are in college; this land was given up so a college could be built on it and you may grow wiser – do this in memory of me. Jesus’ “body ” was his life, and his blood was the blood required to have covenant. Do this in memory of me, not have a ceremony that you pretend the wine and bread are actually transformed into flesh and blood. That is my take on it. God Bless – and have a great day.

    • BUNNY CATCH3R

      I remember singing this song in my Lutheran elementary school choir. It has a youthful/ innocent melody but the lyrics are grotesque– even vampiric.

  4. Susan

    I am also Lutheran but growing up in the church throught the late 70’s on. We sang all the songs you mention and it is one of the reasons I still like the church. I love all of those songs. I particularly like Sons of God mainly because my mother sang it around the house all the time for some reason and it make me think of her as she is gone. Yes the words were disturbing to a young person but did lead to great conversation. My pastor did have a technical answer for me on the subject as so many of my neighbors where/are catholic. He and now I think it is both/and – symbol and actual in some way. Hope you end up reading this 4 years later 🙂

  5. Please advise where I may purchase and or download the song “Sons of God”. I remember it from the 60’s also but somehow I think it goes under a different name in the catholic book of Communal songs. Just recently i heard it sung in Spanish (I recognized the melody and the guitar and it moved me to tears….was 42 years since I last heard it..1966

  6. Ken Banyas

    I hardly know where to begin.
    I first heard this “hymn”, this “folk mass song” at a Catholic boarding school when I was 14. I was immediately repelled by it, and remain so repelled.

    Eat His body, drink His blood,
    And we’ll sing a song of love,…

    You have got to be kidding me.
    But, sigh….you’re not kidding me, are you?

    Yup, I’m one of those dinosaurs who really liked the Tridentine mass.

    Eat his body, drink his blood, and we’ll sing a song of love.

    Vomitous stuff.

  7. John B

    As did Jesus on the night of the last supper, He broke the bread and gave it to His disciples and said take, eat, this is My body which I give you for the remission of sins. So the church with it’s ordained and called servant, the pastor, takes the bread, and by the power of the sacrament and prayer, it is the true body and blood of our Lord. Jesus did the same thing. He broke the bread and said “This is My body.” Do this in remembrance of Me. And that is how we Lutherans partake in this Communion.

  8. Jimmy

    The problem with this hymn is that treats a sacred concept as if it were a frivolous notion. It’s a bizarre juxtaposition. I was raised Catholic. I love sacred music. But this hymn simply gives me the creeps.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *