jump to navigation

21 Steps to a 21st Century Church - Part 2
January 17, 2006

Posted by Dan Edelen in : Best of Cerulean Sanctum, Cerulean Sanctum Series, Christianity in North America, Church Issues, Community, Hospitality, Relevance

Functions : Trackback, Print This Post Print This Post , Email This Post Email This Post

Light in the ChurchThe second installment (#1 here) in the series "21 Steps to a 21st Century Church" adds another four issues the Church in the West, in America in particular, needs to address. None of today's items are earth-shattering, but it amazes me how the simple things get overlooked and fester in our midst:

16. Deal with offenses swiftly

15. Not more church plants, but more connection to existing churches

14. Think like a visitor

13. Our neighbors matter to Jesus

Tomorrow brings four more issues. Thanks for stopping by. I pray that what you read here stirs your mind, your soul, and your actions.

Blessings!

***All posts in this series can be found here.

Tags: , , , ,

Share/Save/Bookmark



No tag for this post.

Related posts:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

10 Comments »

Comment by K. Elijah Layfield
2006-01-16 23:24:00

I really like this series. Thanks for doing it.

 
Comment by Cultural Savage
2006-01-17 10:30:00

Dan,
I appreciate what you have to say about these issues, however, I must call into question your comment about Church planting.

while I am not for creating “the hot new church down the street”, church planting is vital to the mission and health of the Christian community. Yes, we need to grow and strengthen out existing churches, and spliting off to persue another style or whatever is not healthy… this side of the coin I agree with. But Still, church planting needs to happen.

Example: I live in Utah. We care alot about missions here, because we live in the heart of a fairly unreached mission field. There is somewhere between 0.5%-2% of evangelical/protestent Christians in this state. If we did not plant churches here, the existian chruches would all have to be 5,000+ in order to see the majority of people in Utah “churched” (granted, that is not the goal, rather seeing lives lived for Christ is, but still, I hope you see the point).

I don’t mean to rant so hard about this, but it is a dear issue to me. Maybe you could re-work that point into something like “we need to plant churches in a healthy way… one that builds up and from the existing churches.”

Anyways, thanks for your thoughts.

 
Comment by Cultural Savage
2006-01-17 10:33:00

Dan,
I just wanted to also apoligize for such a reactionary comment. I see more of what you are saying, and agree a bit more with you… still, I think Church planting in a healthy way is vital to the catholic Church community.

Thanks again!

 
Comment by Dan Edelen
2006-01-17 10:50:00

K,

Thanks for stopping by and for being a new reader.

 
Comment by Dan Edelen
2006-01-17 11:02:00

Culural Savage,

I can definitely see a need to plant more churches in Mormonism’s backyard so long as one new church doesn’t cannibalize Christians from another church.

In most places in America, though, we’re just shifting our base of Christians from one church to another and that does no one any good. People float from the latest hot new church to the next; I believe this dishonors God. We need to strengthen our existing churches rather than always starting new ones. Every time we start a new church at the expense of an old one, it’s a failure on our part.

Studies have shown that the average church has a heyday of about fifteen years before rot sets in. That’s terrible and we need to do something about it other than starting new churches. Sometimes I think we’re so addicted to the new thing that we can’t commit to anything, including our churches.

 
Comment by Ken Fields
2006-01-17 11:56:00

Dan,

Thanks for the first two installments of this series. I am looking forward to the remainder! I have only one complaint…you want me to change the way I do church? You’ve got to be kidding me…I’m a Baptist. And as you know, we can trace our heritage all the way back to John The Baptist! But, then again, as Baptists I guess we don’t believe in tradition. And change? Definitely not!

 
Comment by codepoke
2006-01-17 12:42:00

we subdivide our Christian population like a randy amoeba

I had to quit reading. That’s hilariously and perfectly appropriate! OK. Composure regained.

 
Comment by codepoke
2006-01-17 12:51:00

Good stuff, Dan.

I could not agree more about the church plants. Do we think the world doesn’t notice that there are dozens of churches within 2 miles, and that none of them work together? They would know we were Christians by our love, if it were visible.

On the neighbor subject, I notice that you make it a personal responsibility. Teaming up sure helps.

 
Comment by cwv warrior
2006-01-18 18:13:00

# 15 raises some issues. I’m not a pastor and won’t be planting a church any time soon but, having tried to work within the churches has been a nightmare for is. I have two angry sons to show for it! First, churches aren’t open to remedial work. Second, churches aren’t genericly under one umbrella. MANY have left the straight and narrow. Third, I don’t really have my own narrow agenda; i’m talkin basic doctrine here.
Maybe you’re gonna get to this issue later since it’s a BIG one? Your ideas are great…welcoming the newbies is huge: I like the idea of a continual beginner’s course to help baby Christians.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post